AD NOAT 06-164        
Attachment        
       
CONTINUING EDUCATION PROGRAM            
Distribution of  Systemwide Indirect Cost             
FY 2006/2007-Revised 10/15/06 A B C=A+B     D   E F=D+E C+F G  H  I=G-H
                                                  ADJUSTMENTS                
Campuses Campus Contact State Fund Charged  0573, 0580 & 0948 Revenue 05/06*     0573, 0580 & 0948 Revenue FY 03/04*      Commission1 Chancellor's Office      Operations1 Total Administrative Costs State     ProRata 2 Total Indirect Cost Allocation   04/05 Revenue Percentages Prior Year Adjustment Factor-Administrative Costs 02/03-04/05 Avg Revenue Percentages Prior Year Adjustment Factor-Commission Total 06/07 Adjustments Total 06/07 Billable Amount    Revised-06/07 2nd-4th Quarterly PFA  Original -06/07  Quarterly PFA Billed  06/07 Diff. One Time Adjustment 3
                                               
Bakersfield Jan Rodgers Invoice               2,928,540 2.23% ########            13,044             13,115              26,158 73,720            99,878   1.89% (1,548.75) 2.14% (6,682.86)         (8,231.61) 91,646.55   22,911.64       22,846.67 64.97
Channel Islands Emily Deakin Invoice               1,053,709 0.80%   339,905             4,693               4,719                9,412 3,762            13,174   0.38% (311.39) 0.27% (843.16)         (1,154.55) 12,019.33   3,004.83         2,866.65 138.18
Chico Doreen Mendes 0573               1,686,558 1.28% ########             7,512               7,553              15,065 56,490            71,555   1.53% (1,253.75) 1.57% (4,902.85)         (6,156.60) 65,397.99   16,349.50       16,170.13 179.37
Dominguez Hills Brenda Blow Invoice               6,130,796 4.67% ########            27,306             27,455              54,761 229,693          284,454   3.95% (3,236.80) 4.35% (13,584.32)        (16,821.13) 267,633.06   66,908.27       66,676.86 231.41
Fresno Sandy Griffin 0948               3,464,820 2.64% ########            15,432             15,516              30,948 27,738            58,686   3.56% (2,917.22) 3.73% (11,648.17)       (14,565.39) 44,120.91   11,030.23       10,672.94 357.29
Fullerton Linda Godding 0573               9,131,034 6.95% ########            40,669             40,891              81,560 323,558          405,118   9.54% (7,817.49) 8.30% (25,919.51)       (33,737.01) 371,380.76   92,845.19       90,563.99 2,281.20
East Bay Linda Eick 0573               6,337,941 4.83% ########            28,229             28,383              56,611 104,299          160,910   4.29% (3,515.41) 4.41% (13,771.69)        (17,287.11) 143,623.33   35,905.83       35,409.03 496.80
Humboldt Carl Hansen Invoice               1,683,807 1.28% ########             7,500               7,540              15,040 44,846            59,886   1.58% (1,294.72) 1.35% (4,215.82)         (5,510.55) 54,375.47   13,593.87       13,196.83 397.04
Long Beach Mike Jones Invoice             16,662,355 12.69% ########            74,213             74,618            148,831 415,596          564,427   10.43% (8,546.80) 10.53% (32,883.43)       (41,430.23) 522,996.43   130,749.11     129,391.56 1,357.55
Los Angeles Ann Harris  0573               3,654,069 2.78% ########            16,275             16,364              32,639 76,294          108,933   2.92% (2,392.78) 3.49% (10,898.69)       (13,291.46) 95,641.23   23,910.31       23,953.39 (43.08)
Maritime Academy Stephen Mastro 0573                  519,257 0.40%   613,662             2,313               2,325                4,638 0              4,638   0.33% (270.42) 0.44% (1,374.05)         (1,644.46) 2,993.62   748.40            788.86 (40.46)
Monterey Bay Cathy Rank Invoice                  900,485 0.69%   439,921             4,011               4,033                8,043 27,862            35,905   0.58% (475.28) 0.61% (1,904.93)         (2,380.21) 33,525.06   8,381.27         8,324.85 56.42
Northridge Michael Weaver Invoice             13,479,470 10.26% ########            60,037             60,364            120,401 334,990          455,391   11.02% (9,030.27) 11.09% (34,632.22)      (43,662.49) 411,728.16   102,932.04     101,469.86 1,462.18
Pomona Edwin Barnes 0948               2,164,672 1.65% ########             9,641               9,694              19,335 69,327            88,662   1.86% (1,524.17) 1.93% (6,027.07)         (7,551.23) 81,110.94   20,277.74       20,076.37 201.37
Sacramento Felice Dinsfriend Invoice             15,747,410 11.99% ########            70,138             70,520            140,658 334,658          475,316   10.80% (8,849.99) 11.11% (34,694.67)      (43,544.67) 431,771.57   107,942.89     106,698.36 1,244.53
San Bernardino Mark Erickson Invoice               2,690,484 2.05% ########            11,983             12,049              24,032 108,689          132,721   3.10% (2,540.28) 2.90% (9,056.22)       (11,596.49) 121,124.32   30,281.08       29,698.24 582.84
San Diego Barbara Strumsky 0580               9,677,235 7.37% ########            43,102             43,337              86,439 179,567          266,006   5.98% (4,900.27) 6.97% (21,766.15)      (26,666.42) 239,339.10   59,834.77       59,784.57 50.20
San Francisco Elaine Feng Invoice             10,702,181 8.15% ########            47,667             47,927              95,593 278,887          374,480   6.38% (5,228.05) 6.82% (21,297.72)      (26,525.77) 347,954.72   86,988.68       86,454.03 534.65
San Jose Erzsebet Ujvary Invoice             13,827,827 10.53% ########            61,588             61,924            123,512 310,269          433,781   12.04% (9,866.10) 10.98% (34,288.71)       (44,154.81) 389,626.42   97,406.60       94,921.83 2,484.77
San Luis Obispo Scott Cooke 0948               1,998,436 1.52% ########             8,901               8,949              17,850 45,990            63,840   1.14% (934.17) 1.20% (3,747.40)         (4,681.57) 59,158.77   14,789.69       14,679.62 110.07
San Marcos Tricia Henlon 0948               1,411,098 1.07% ########             6,285               6,319              12,604 61,667            74,271   1.83% (1,499.58) 1.31% (4,090.91)        (5,590.49) 68,680.65   17,170.16       16,512.31 657.85
Sonoma Janice Peterson 0573               4,633,651 3.53% ########            20,638             20,750              41,388 129,547          170,935   3.25% (2,663.19) 3.50% (10,929.92)        (13,593.11) 157,342.36   39,335.59       39,083.43 252.16
Stanislaus Lynnette Richmond Invoice                  858,688 0.65%   689,610             3,825               3,845                7,670 35,132            42,802   1.62% (1,327.50) 1.00% (3,122.83)        (4,450.33) 38,351.60   9,587.90         8,880.88 707.02
                                               
       $        131,344,522 100% ########    $    585,000  $        588,189  $      1,173,189 3,272,581  $    4,445,770   100% (81,944.38) 100%    (312,283.29)       (394,227.67) 4,051,542.34   1,012,885.58     999,121.26 13,764.32
         
CSU Fund 441 441   441     441
FIRMS Object Codes 660025 660025 660025     660025
Offset 305022 305022 305022 305022 305022     305022
 Comm budget  Ed's Dept. budget New Method Applied    
     
*  Revenues collected in the Continuing Education Fund, Dorm Revenue Fund and Trust Fund applicable to the CE/EE program were included.        
1  Numbers used for Commission Expense and Chancellor's Office Operations are budgeted amounts.        
2  New Methodology applied in calculating State Pro Rata.          
   (Allocated based upon campus prior year retirement expense as a percent of total retirement.)        
3  Per the decision of the commission, the allocation of commission refund is based on three year avg revenue percentage for fiscal years 02/03-04/05.