![]() |
| Office of the Chancellor / Public Affairs |
Monday, July 28, 2003
|
Sacramento Bee 7-27-03 Editorial: A good deal? Well . . . |
|
|
California has a budget deal. As with all deals, the question is whether it is a good one or a bad one.
That depends on your viewpoint. If you work for the state or a school
district, or if you're wondering whether your local school district will
be able to pay teachers this fall, or if you're worried about whether
you or someone you know will continue to receive benefits from the state
-- if, like many Californians, you have a direct stake in seeing state
government continue to function in the short run, then this deal probably
looks pretty good. But this much is obvious. The state went into this budget cycle with an ongoing structural deficit of somewhere between $10 billion and $20 billion annually, depending upon whom, if anybody, you believe. And it will go into the next budget cycle with an ongoing deficit of about the same size. In other words, the fundamental problem remains: The state's taxes do not yield enough money to pay for all the things its citizens want it to do. And the citizens' representatives, in the Assembly and Senate, can agree on nothing better than stopgap measures -- including borrowing $10.7 billion -- to make up much of the difference. That $10.7 billion gap represents the failure of the state's elected officials to come to terms with reality. And anybody who thinks that is a good deal would be well advised to stay far away from offers of free desert land, miracle profits from gifting clubs and unclaimed riches in Nigeria.
|
|
|
These news clips are provided by the Public Affairs Department of The California State University. They are intended for the internal use of The California State University system and should not be redistributed. Questions and submissions may be sent to publicaffairs@calstate.edu. |
|