Campus: CSU Stanislaus -- August 26, 2005
CSU Stanislaus Professors Publish Revealing Report On Methods
For Treating Autism
A California research team that includes a pair of California State University,
Stanislaus psychology professors has taken a significant step in what most experts
predict will be a long journey in developing effective treatment for autism. They
were part of a team of psychologists who conducted a study that dispels some
popular notions about how to treat autism.
Autism is a disorder of brain development characterized by deficits in language,
learning and social interaction. It typically appears during the first three years
of life and affects males about four times more often than females across all
income strata and ethnic groups. Genetics seems to be a contributing factor, but
the specific causes of autism have not yet been identified.
The National Institutes of Health note that prevalence studies have been done in
several states and also in the United Kingdom, Europe, and Asia. Prevalence estimates
range from 2 to 6 per 1,000 children. Most individuals with autism who do not
receive effective treatment are unlikely to live independently as adults.
The California study found that intensive Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) was a
substantially more effective treatment for a group of preschool children with
autism than the mixture of methods that is provided in many education and treatment
programs. ABA emphasizes breaking skills down into small parts and building them
systematically through repetition and positive reinforcement. At the same time,
behaviors that are harmful or that interfere with learning are analyzed carefully
and are not reinforced. The long-term goal is to help each child be as successful
and independent as possible at school, at home and in the community.
The pioneering study was completed by CSU Stanislaus psychology faculty members
Dr. Jane Howard and Dr. Harold Stanislaw and their colleagues Coleen Sparkman,
Director of The Kendall School in Modesto; Dr. Howard Cohen, Clinical Director of
Valley Mountain Regional Center in Stockton; and Dr. Gina Green of San Diego, a
nationally known researcher and consultant in the field of autism.
"This study corroborates earlier studies showing the power of early intensive
behavior analytic intervention," said Howard, the study's principal investigator.
"It is important because it is one of only a few studies in which the ABA intervention
was delivered through a community-based, rather than a university-affiliated program.
These results signal the potential for delivering effective intervention without
the resources of a university-based clinic."
Howard noted that this aspect is important because there are too few university-affiliated
programs capable of providing ABA intervention for the growing number of children
diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders.
"The study is also noteworthy because it is only the second one to compare the
common practice of combining multiple treatment approaches ("eclectic" treatment)
with a cohesive approach based on the science of applied behavior analysis,"
The report indicates that most autism experts agree that the earlier the intervention
is delivered, the better the outcomes. It also questions the suitability of treating
children with autism using a variety of intervention methods.
Although it may seem reasonable to many parents and professionals to use a mixture
of treatment methods, the researchers note that this practice has not been carefully
Co-researcher Green noted that scientific studies of "eclectic" treatment are
necessary because funding treatments that have not been scientifically validated
waste scarce resources and costs these children the opportunity to realize their
"Although ABA methods have proven effective for building skills in people with
autism of all ages, it is not clear that effective intervention provided later in
life can have the same impact as it does in the preschool years," Green said.
According to information provided by the California Department of Developmental
Disabilities, the cost of providing basic services to adolescents and adults with
autism throughout the lifespan is substantially more per person than the cost of
comparable services for individuals with other developmental disabilities.
The authors noted in their article that "eclectic" or mixed-method treatment
approach is often recommended for children with autism by consultants, educators
and clinicians. It is widely used in both public and private schools. Eclectic
treatment for children with autism often include the Picture Exchange Communication
System (PECS), sensory integration therapy, speech and language therapy, discrete
trial training, play therapy, and techniques drawn from the Teaching and Education
of Autism and related Communication handicapped Children (TEACCH) program developed
in North Carolina.
Green noted that some of these techniques, such as sensory integration therapy,
have not been shown through sound research to produce measurable improvements in
useful skills or reductions in problem behavior.
"Children with autism may appear to enjoy participating in some of these therapies,
but to date, there is no strong evidence that they benefit in any meaningful,
lasting way from participating in them," Green said.
The CSU Stanislaus study put eclectic and ABA-based interventions to the test over
a 14-month period with three groups of pre-school children with autism who were
similar when they entered the study. A total of 61 children who were under the age
of 4 when they were diagnosed and began treatment for their autism participated
in the study, which was conducted in Stanislaus, San Joaquin, Sacramento, Placer
and Nevada counties.
After 14 months of intervention, most children participating in intensive ABA for
25 to 40 hours a week had made substantial improvements in most skill areas,
according to numerous standardized evaluations conducted by professionals who were
not affiliated with any of the treatment programs. Many of those children actually
had accelerated rates of development in language, cognitive and self-help skills.
One group of preschool children with autism received intensive "eclectic"
intervention in specialized classrooms for 30 hours per week. That intervention
featured combinations of methods designed for children with autism customized to
each child and delivered in a format in which one trained adult worked with 1 to
2 children. Another group participated in early intervention programs for children
with various developmental delays, also utilizing a combination of methods for
15-20 hours per week. Both of those groups also received 14 months of intervention.
Despite its widespread availability and popularity, "eclectic" intervention proved
comparatively ineffective. The two groups whose treatment consisted of a combination
of methods made negligible gains in some skills, and lost ground in others. Their
rates of development remained largely unchanged.
Although the intellectual functioning of the children in the 3 groups was similarly
delayed when the study began, 16 of 29 children in the intensive ABA group, tested
within the normal range at the end of the study. In contrast, only 5 of 32
children in the two "eclectic" treatment groups combined had normal intellectual
functioning after 14 months of intervention.
Similarly, children who received intensive ABA treatment had gains on standardized
language tests that were more than double those of the children who received
"eclectic" intervention. In fact, at the end of the 14-month intervention period,
the ABA group had an average rate of language development that was greater than
that of typically developing preschoolers.
According to the researchers, the accelerated rates of development mean that these
children are positioned to catch up to their typically developing peers if they
continue to receive intensive ABA intervention for another 1-2 years. The prognosis,
for the children who received "eclectic" treatment was, on the whole, substantially
"This study suggests that the 'shot gun' approach to autism intervention, where
children receive a little bit of everything -- including interventions that have
yet to demonstrate their effectiveness -- needs to be examined critically," Howard
Similar findings were reported in 2002 by Norwegian researcher Svein Eikeseth and
his colleagues. They compared intensive ABA with intensive "eclectic" treatment in
a study involving children of elementary age with autism. Eikeseth and colleagues
also found that intensive behavior analytic intervention was superior to one that
utilized mixed methods, even though both groups of children received one-to-one
instruction for 30 hours each week for a year.
"The popular notion that virtually any intervention can produce meaningful benefits
for children with autism if it is provided intensively has not been confirmed by
two controlled studies that addressed that hypothesis," the CSU Stanislaus
researchers and colleagues noted in their report.
The study conducted by Howard and her colleagues, titled "A comparison of intensive
behavior analytic and eclectic treatments for young children with autism," is
published in the July/August issue of the Journal of Research and Developmental
Disabilities. The article can be purchased online at:
The study was partially supported by grants from California State University,
Stanislaus and Valley Mountain Regional Center.
Contact: Jane Howard, (209) 572-2589 or Gina Green, (619) 518-4990