Campus: CSU Long Beach -- September 3, 2004

Cell Phone Use Study by Cal State Long Beach Professor Finds Older Adults Have More Difficulty Driving While Using Cell Phones

A recently completed Cal State Long Beach study on the use of cell phones while driving has shown, and not surprisingly, that the response time for all drivers is seriously slowed, but the slowing for older individuals is much more significant than younger adults.

Overseen by CSULB Psychology Professor Joellen Hartley, the study was conducted by students who worked with 18 older (65 years of age and older) and 18 younger (18-30 years of age) subjects. Participants were not required to actually drive a car for this particular study. Instead, the experiment was done using computers and simulated scenarios.

"We were looking at the differences between older and younger people and the effects of the intensity of a cell phone conversation on their performance of a driving task," Hartley said.

In two of the three scenarios, participants were involved in actual cell phone conversations and asked to respond to information on the computer screen directly before them. Their attention and decision-making processes were then evaluated by the speed and accuracy of their responses.

"What we found was that the older people are slower," noted Hartley, who was not surprised by that finding alone. "They almost always are. But, as soon as cell phone conversations were introduced into the process, the response time for both age groups was really lengthened, and much more so for older adults than for young adults."

Identified keys on the computer keyboard were related to gas and brake pedals and, per prior instruction, participants responded in different ways to color and position of signals on the screen. More specifically, the evaluation was based on how long it took to press a key designated as the gas pedal, how long it took to lift their finger from the same key, and then how long it took them to press one of two other keys (brake pedals) when the signal changed color yet again.

"Really, two things were happening," said Hartley. "The subject's attention had to be engaged on the screen to detect changes in the display and then they had to make a response decision based on what was on the screen. So we were looking at both attention and decision-making processes by measuring how long it took the person to respond to something that happened and how long it took them to press the correct key."

Prior to the actual experiment, participants were allowed to practice until they were comfortable with the process. The exercise involved participants talking on cell phones with student assistants. A hands-free device was used to rule out difficulties holding the phone while doing the task. One conversation was of low intensity, and the other was high intensity. The latter scenario theoretically requires the use of more mental resources to manipulate and update information and come up with a response, Hartley explained. The final test involved no cell phone conversation with participants just completing the task.

"Where the major effects were seen, for both age groups, was not so much in the time to make a complex response decision, but on the time needed to grab the subject's attention." said Hartley. "For the older participants, for example, in the high intensity conversation, the amount of time needed to grab their attention (i.e., taking their finger off the gas pedal) was increased by almost 250 percent. For the younger participants, the increase was nearly 150 percent."

In addition to reacting more slowly under more intense scenarios, Hartley noted that the elderly participants were more prone to making errors.

"Where we see that decision processes are affected is when we look at the errors, the mistakes they make when they finally do respond," said Hartley. "The difference between the young and the old in decision accuracy in the absence of a cell phone conversation was not significant, but as soon as a cell phone conversation was introduced, the accuracy for the older people dropped. In younger people accuracy did not decline until they were involved in high intensity conversations, but even then only a little.

"So, in a nutshell," Hartley concluded, "cell phone conversations divert attention from changes in a visual display and interfere with the accuracy of a decision. Young adults are not immune to these effects, but older adults are much less able to cope with the demands that a cell phone conversation makes on attention. The implications for driving safety are obvious."

Media contacts: Rick Gloady, 562/985-5454, Shayne Schroeder, 562/985-1727

Public Affairs Offices/Campus News
[Bakersfield] [Chancellor's Office] [Channel Islands] [Chico]
[Dominguez Hills] [East Bay] [Fresno] [Fullerton] [Humboldt] [Long Beach] [Los Angeles] [Maritime Academy] [Monterey_Bay] [Northridge] [Pomona] [Sacramento] [San Bernardino] [San Diego] [San Francisco] [San Jose] [San Luis Obispo] [San Marcos] [Sonoma] [Stanislaus]