Capital Planning, Design and Construction | 2008 External Customer Satisfaction Survey Responses | Balanced Scorecard | Business and Finance | CSU
Balanced Scorecard

2008 Business and Finance
External Customer Satisfaction Survey Responses

External Customer Satisfaction Survey Responses Home »
Capital Planning, Design and Construction Very
Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very
Satisfied
Don't Know Total 2008 Average Score 2007 Average Score 2005 Average Score
Ready and willing to respond. 0 3 1 27 16 47 94 4.19 4.24 4.13
  0.0% 3.2% 1.1% 28.7% 17.0% 50.0% 100.0%      
Provides right training to meet needs of campus staff. 0 0 4 27 14 45 90 4.22 4.06 4.42
  0.0% 0.0% 4.4% 30.0% 15.6% 50.0% 100.0%      
Partnership between CPDC and Campus. 0 3 4 20 19 3 48 4.24 4.17 4.09
  0.0% 4.2% 8.3% 41.7% 39.6% 6.3% 100.0%      
Visit frequency benefits campus master planning and project mgt. 0 5 12 12 11 8 48 3.73 3.79 3.62
  0.0% 10.4% 25.0% 25.0% 22.9% 16.7% 100.0%      
Rate level of support from following:
Executive 1 1 5 15 16 10 48 4.16 4.48 4.32
  2.1% 2.1% 10.4% 31.3% 33.3% 20.8% 100.0%      
Planning 1 6 12 14 10 5 48 3.60 3.80 3.67
  2.1% 12.5% 25.0% 29.2% 20.8% 10.4% 100.0%      
Architecture & Engineering 1 2 8 23 8 6 48 3.83 3.90 3.99
  2.1% 4.2% 16.7% 47.9% 16.7% 12.5% 100.0%      
Construction Management 1 2 3 19 17 6 48 4.17 4.27 4.41
  2.1% 4.2% 6.3% 39.6% 35.4% 12.5% 100.0%      
Plant, Energy and Utilities 1 2 7 17 14 7 48 4.00 4.19 4.00
  2.1% 4.2% 14.6% 35.4% 29.2% 14.6% 100.0%      
Land Use Planning & Environmental Review 1 1 10 14 12 10 48 3.92 4.24 4.15
  2.1% 2.1% 20.8% 29.2% 25.0% 20.8% 100.0%      
Total Responses 48 38 89

This next year CPDC will:

  1. Significantly reduce the frequency of Facilities Management training programs in response to the state budget reductions.
  2. Continue to support staff visits to the campuses in order to better understand campus needs and mutually develop solutions.
  3. Continue efforts to streamline the capital planning, design and construction document submittal process with the use of technology.
  4. Provide better support to Physical Plant in benchmarking, labor relations and apprenticeship training.
  5. Work to improve conservation and sustainability efforts by securing grant funding and fostering systemwide communication.