| |
 |
| Budget
Development
As with the 2005 customer
satisfaction survey, the questions used by the Budget Office for the 2007 survey were general
in nature. However, these questions were framed in an attempt to give management an
objective view of the various functions and services the Budget Office performs. The
overall responses from the 2007 survey were positive. Of the 56 participants in the
survey, 69.5% had responses of “satisfied” or “very satisfied”, 5.3% had responses of
“dissatisfied”, and the remaining percentage had either a neutral response or did not
know. None of the participants responded with “very dissatisfied,” which is an
improvement from the 2005 survey. Furthermore, the 2007 survey results show an
increase in customer satisfaction with regards to Budget Office responsiveness
to inquiries and knowledge on issues impacting campuses. The Budget Office strives
for complete satisfaction from the constituents it serves, and will continue to work towards that effort.
.
Question #4 (regarding clear, informative and accurate Budget Office documents)
received the highest number of “dissatisfied” responses from 2007 survey participants.
Of the 56 participants, 12.7% were “dissatisfied,” which is a slight improvement from
the 2005 survey results. The Budget Office strives to provide detailed and clear
explanations of policy descriptions and budgetary allocation objectives. However,
it also recognizes the inherent complexity of the issues that are communicated, and
the different audiences that read and interpret its official communications. At times,
the Budget Office assumes the reader has some historical and procedural knowledge of
the communication document. The Budget Office will continue to review its official
communications with scrutiny to ensure accurate and clear conveyance of information.
The 2007 survey excluded open-ended questions, which resulted in fewer
customer comments. The Budget Office plans to include open-ended questions
in the next survey, which may increase the number of comments. Customer comments
and Budget Office responses are noted below:
-
“Customer Comment: “For CSU Budget
Office, would like more detailed backup calculations of amounts in budget letters,
so less inquiries to CSU Budget staff are required.”
Response: Additional Budget Letter information (e.g. Budget Allocation Memo) is shared with
CSU Budget officers at in-person system-wide meetings, which were held during August 2007.
Furthermore, backup information will be posted on the CSU Budget Officers’
shared folder in the future for Budget Office projections of State University
Fee Revenue calculations. The Budget Office staff continues to be available
for meetings with campuses to answer any questions regarding Budget Letters,
some of which are complex.”
-
“Customer Comment: “Timely updates
on CSU and State budget issues”.
Response: Information regarding CSU and State budget issues is released
as soon as possible. Means of dissemination include CSU Leader, and CSU
Chancellor, Public Affairs, and executive management communications releases.”
-
“Customer Comment: “I'd value a small
budget and finance workshop for Deans…or perhaps a series.”
Response: A budget workshop for Deans may be more appropriately developed at
the campus level. The Budget Office does not prepare or analyze budgets at the
individual college level for each campus. If there is a desire for Deans to understand
system-level budgets, a budget and finance workshop could be coordinated at the division
level with contribution from the system Budget Office..”
-
“Customer Comment: “Training on CSU budget,
management and business practices. If there is a way to get certified in a different
skill area while doing my daily job, I’d do the work to be certified.”
Response: CSU Budget training is offered at CSU 101 classes, and the CSU Budget
Officers’ meetings. A certification program for Budget Analysts does not exist
at the CSU. Persons interested in becoming a Budget Analyst may consider obtaining
a higher education degree in a related field, which may include finance, economics
and/or public administration.”
In response to the 2005 customer satisfaction survey results, the Budget
Office initiated a series of campus visits to improve customer communication
and relations. Consequently, the 2007 survey included additional questions
regarding campus visits. Of the approximately 20 survey responses, 64.1% were
“satisfied” or “very satisfied,” 2.5% “dissatisfied” and the remaining percentage
had either a neutral response or did not know. None of the participants responded
with “very dissatisfied.” In addition, when asked if survey participants would
recommend campus visits by the Budget Office to other campuses, 100% of the
respondents selected “perhaps” or “definitely yes.”
As stated previously, the Budget Office understands the
complexity of the issues it attempts to communicate and will continue to
review its official communications and engage its core audiences for feedback
on how to best improve its documents to achieve clarity and understanding. In addition,
the Budget Office hopes to continue with campus visits to meet with budget, accounting,
and business office staff to provide the technical expertise in addressing campus issues,
and gain a better understanding of the daily challenges campuses face. Furthermore,
campus visits allow the Budget Office staff assess where it can be most helpful to campuses.
A summary of the actual responses is provided
below. |
| |
| 1. |
How satisfied
are you that Budget Office staff members are responsive
to inquiries and requests for information? |
2. |
How satisfied
are you that Budget Office staff members seem knowledgeable
and current on issues impacting campuses? |
| Label |
Frequency |
Percent |
| Very Dissatisfied |
0 |
0.0% |
| Dissatisfied |
1 |
1.8% |
| Neutral |
2 |
3.6% |
| Satisfied |
17 |
30.4% |
| Very Satisfied |
30 |
53.6% |
| Do
Not Know |
6 |
10.7% |
| Total |
56 |
100% |
|
| Label |
Frequency |
Percent |
| Very Dissatisfied |
0 |
0.0% |
| Dissatisfied |
2 |
3.6% |
| Neutral |
5 |
8.9% |
| Satisfied |
16 |
28.6% |
| Very Satisfied |
27 |
48.2% |
| Do
Not Know |
6 |
10.7% |
| Total |
56 |
100% |
|
|
|
|
| 3. |
How satisfied
are you that Allocation Memos are issued in a timely manner? |
4. |
How satisfied
are you that Budget Development Office documents, e.g.,
coded memoranda, allocation letters, etc., are clear,
informative, and accurate? |
| Label |
Frequency |
Percent |
| Very Dissatisfied |
0 |
0.0% |
| Dissatisfied |
4 |
7.1% |
| Neutral |
6 |
10.7% |
| Satisfied |
19 |
33.9% |
| Very Satisfied |
13 |
23.2% |
| Do
Not Know |
14 |
25.0% |
| Total |
56 |
100% |
|
| Label |
Frequency |
Percent |
| Very Dissatisfied |
0 |
0.0% |
| Dissatisfied |
7 |
12.7% |
| Neutral |
6 |
10.9% |
| Satisfied |
17 |
30.9% |
| Very Satisfied |
16 |
29.1% |
| Do
Not Know |
9 |
16.4% |
| Total |
55 |
100% |
|
|
|
|
| 5. |
Budget Office staff was responsive
to unique, campus-specific funding issues |
6. |
Budget Office staff was responsive
to unique, campus-specific funding issues |
| Label |
Frequency |
Percent |
| Very Dissatisfied |
0 |
0.0% |
| Dissatisfied |
0 |
0.0% |
| Neutral |
3 |
14.3% |
| Satisfied |
5 |
23.8% |
| Very Satisfied |
9 |
42.9% |
| Do
Not Know |
4 |
19.0% |
| Total |
21 |
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Date Last updated: May 16, 2006
|