|
|
 |
2009 Quality Improvement Awards - Winners
While the results of our
quality improvement efforts are the true rewards for our hard
work in striving to make the CSU better, there are those individuals
who deserve special recognition. The recipients of the
Quality Improvement Awards for 2009 are: |
Awards Categories |
|
QI Champion of the Year
Pictured from left to right: Linda Hawk, CSU San Marcos (Award Winner)
Dr. Karen S. Haynes, CSU San Marcos (Presenting the Award)
Vice President Hawk has been a participant and leader of QI efforts since she came to San Marcos. Immediately after assuming her position as Vice President, she set about engaging the leadership team in establishing a new vision for the division and instilling a culture of QI into all aspects of the organization. To maintain the momentum of this new vision she developed a guiding principles program which is highlighted and reaffirmed throughout the organization using a variety of communication tools that disseminates via a QI approach to management to all departments. She embraces an approach to management that models all the value that QI can bring to an organization.
Award Criteria
Leadership: Demonstrated leadership in the promotion and implementation of QI initiatives (example: process improvement teams), campus and/or systemwide.
Communication: Effective communicator of the principles of QI, campus and/or systemwide (examples: campus or division QI website, QI training or activities, coordination of QI groups, published articles, etc.).
Knowledge Sharing: Developing and sharing model practices, campus and/or systemwide. |
|
Distinguished Service in QI
Abbi Stone, Sacramento State University
Over a span of nearly 10 years, Abbi has championed successful quality improvement efforts at two CSU campuses. Her leadership was instrumental in the development of comprehensive and widely respected programs at San Marcos and Sacramento, and the active participation of both campuses in the systemwide QI programs. She has been a pioneer in starting up new programs and the breadth of her QI efforts has made a significant impact at both campuses.
Award Criteria
Ongoing promotion and support of QI on a systemwide or campuswide basis.
Leadership or membership in a systemwide QI committee resulting in significant demonstrated benefit to the CSU. |
|
Innovative Practice
Admission, Evaluation and Selection team- Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo
Pictured from left to right:
Elaine Thurmond
Lygia Smidt
Dara Manker
Donna Amos
The Admission, Evaluation and Selection team automated the faculty-designed comprehensive review process that is used to screen, score and select students for admission. This effort brought together a cross functional group of experts from across the campus who collaborated on an innovative way to automate the selection process. They used QI tools to define the problem and develop a strategic plan, which resulted in a transformation of the classical organization model in place. One of the most significant adoptions was the multi-criteria admission selection scheme (MCA) that combines academic factors with other objective values to comprehensively review all student applicants for selection. Applicants compete for admission against other applicants applying to the same major. Decisions are based on the available spaces in each major, which varies from quarter to quarter. CSUMentor, an on-line application, was utilized as the electronic admission portfolio and was integrated with CMS Oracle/PeopleSoft Student Administration Admissions Module and the MCA database. This is a model that could be applied throughout the CSU.
Award Criteria
Methodology: Utilization of QI tools and concepts, such as performance measurement, customer surveys, process mapping, or balanced scorecard.
Outcomes: Documented and demonstrated results, such as reduced cost, increased productivity, improved customer satisfaction, potential best practices, lessons learned.
Measurement and Assessment: Identified methods for assessing the effort after implementation (example: performance measures, status reporting, customer surveys, etc.). |
|
QI Facilitator of the Year
Dennis Muraoka, CSU Channel Islands
Dr. Muraoka successfully used QI principles in his role as campus Accreditation Liaison Officer, which resulted in Channel Islands earning both accreditation and praise from the team and WASC. The inclusive structure he designed for completing the accreditation process involved the entire campus and ensured broad awareness of institutional and divisional goals, each unit’s role in meeting those goals, and each employee’s responsibility for furthering the successful operation of the university. He established a novel “bottoms up” approach for an on-going assessment approach throughout the campus, which can serve as an excellent model for other campuses.
Award Criteria
Campus Involvement: Promoter of QI on his/her campus leading to process improvement efforts, utilization of assessment tools, and increasing campus participation in campus and systemwide QI initiatives resulting in demonstrated benefit to the campus community and/or its stakeholders.
Mentoring: Supporter of and resource for others, dedicating time and effort, helping others understand and apply QI methodologies and tools, leading or involving others in a QI program (for a campus, department, or team) with a demonstrated benefit to another individual. Examples may include working with other quality improvement facilitators, giving training or workshops on QI tools, publishing QI articles in a campus newsletter, developing a campus QI website, or performing outreach activities.
Other Contributions: Active participation in systemwide and/or multi-campus QI activities (e.g., training, workshops, etc.), initiatives or committees or author of one or more articles for the QI newsletter. |
|
QI Team of the Year
Environmental Health & Safety Function Team
Pictured from left to right:
Gary Pons, CSU Long Beach
Kevin Brady, CSU Los Angeles
Regina Frasca, CSU San Marcos
Tom Whitfield, CSU Fullerton
Scott Bourdon, CSU Fullerton
The team led an effort to implement the first ever Customer Satisfaction survey for the Environmental Health & Safety function in the system. They developed a survey tool that was administered at eight CSU campuses in 2008, establishing a new tool for benchmarking and nurturing a nascent culture of QI good practice in this functional area.
Award Criteria
Methodology: Utilization of QI tools and concepts, such as performance measurement, customer surveys, process mapping, or balanced scorecard.
Outcomes: Documented and demonstrated results, such as reduced cost, increased productivity, improved customer satisfaction, potential best practices, lessons learned.
Measurement and Assessment: Identified methods for assessing the effort after implementation (example: performance measurement, status reporting, customer surveys, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated:
June 04, 2009
|