| CSUQI:
Can you give me a brief history and description of how you became
the Quality Improvement Facilitator at Humboldt State University?
PP:
In my previous role as a CMS Project Director on the CMS Central
team, I had worked with both Matt Ceppi and Robyn Pennington.
In observing their work, I noted the central goals of improving
our ways of doing business, increasing productivity, and maximizing
the value of our IT investments. Shortly after accepting the CMS
Project Director position at Humboldt State, I realized that many
of the QI initiatives could help with the myriad challenges facing
me in the new role.
CSUQI: What has been the most notable QI achievement at
HSU?
PP:
QI activities at HSU are just beginning, but we have hit the ground
running. The campus is working to hire a fulltime dedicated QI
analyst. Furthermore, Matt and Robyn from the CO systemwide team
recently visited the campus to provide business-process mapping
and improvement training. That two-day course was extremely well
received and has generated an overwhelming interest in further
business-process improvement activities. A follow-up planning
session will be scheduled in January so that campus strategies
can be further developed.
CSUQI: Tell me about some of the QI initiatives at HSU.
PP:
HSU plans to incorporate quality improvement techniques wherever
possible. Initial plans will focus on the Common Management Systems
project, and we plan to leverage the recent process-improvement
training. Those techniques will be applied to ensure a thorough
audit of the existing Banner (student administration) system,
which is scheduled to be replaced by PeopleSoft through a series
of rolling go-lives from 1/07 through 10/08. In particular, the
process mapping and improvement techniques should help facilitate
and streamline the fit-gap process for that project. The same
techniques should also prove valuable during our HCM 8.9 upgrade,
during which we hope to learn more about novel ways to use PeopleSoft
so that we can make the most of the CSU’s investment in
PeopleSoft.
CSUQI:
What is on your wish list for the future of QI for the CSU system
or at HSU?
PP:
First, I would like to see the business-process mapping techniques
unequivocally embraced by those campuses that share similar PeopleSoft
SA timelines (including the “Banner Collaborative”
and others). Such an approach would allow for more thorough collaboration
and better leveraging of resources across the system. Looking
further ahead, a single, consolidated data warehouse of the data
from all campuses could greatly improve data analysis for our
university system. Other initiatives such as corporate dashboards
could help end users better recognize the value of our investments
in PeopleSoft.
CSUQI:
What resources have you used to assist with your QI efforts?
PP:
HSU has taken advantage of the process mapping and improvement
training offered by the systemwide QI team. We plan to purchase
several of the recommended “additional reading” books
from that course and review them as a team.
CSUQI:
What techniques have you used to gain buy-in for QI initiatives
in the CMS department?
PP:
As the CMS Director, I immediately saw QI initiatives as possible
solutions to the many challenges faced by this project. For example,
common issues of reporting might be addressed through the corporate
dashboards. As another example, we can ensure that our campus
fully leverages the CMS baseline with the use of business-process
mapping and improvement techniques as well as a well-planned campus
fit-gap and/or business-process review workshops.
CSUQI:
What is your biggest challenge in leading the QI efforts at Humboldt?
And how have you overcome the challenge?
PP:
The biggest challenge was generating sufficient interest in a
previously nebulous idea. Once the idea was presented as a panacea,
that challenge dissipated. But the future will hold additional
challenges around keeping up the QI momentum to ensure that newly
learned skills are fully applied and that they optimize our IT
investments. We should be able to overcome those challenges by
offering everyone within the organization a roadmap for applying
QI strategies to all areas of the work required to run a campus.
|