CAPITAL
PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
Elvyra
F. San Juan, Assistant Vice Chancellor
CSU
Facilities Management Conference:
Capital Planning, Design and Construction is hosting the 2005
CSU Facilities Management Conference, October 23-26, at the
Paradise Pier® Hotel, overlooking Disney’s California
Adventure™ Park in Anaheim. This conference is exclusively
for California State University and University of California
faculty, staff and students.
Under
the overarching theme, to Inspire, Innovate, and Achieve,
the conference will be a springboard for increasing awareness
and knowledge of sustainability and its integration throughout
the design, development, and operation of the university campus.
With the students’ keen interest in sustainability, this
is the first CSU facilities conference that has extended a warm
welcome to their participation, both as presenters and attendees.
The
conference keynote speakers will inspire new consideration for
sustainability in the university. Many CSU and UC staff are
participating in the sessions, sharing their campus stories
of both success and challenge, in order to inspire greater innovations
and achievements throughout the higher education systems. The
six concurrent session tracks aim to lead different interest
groups through the conference program:
Fantasyland:
Adventureland:
Main Street: Tomorrowland: |
Planning
Design and Construction
Plant Management
Energy Management |
| Adventureland: |
Design
and Construction |
| Main
Street: |
Plant
Management |
| Tomorrowland: |
Energy
Management |
| Frontierland: |
Property
Acquisition and Management |
| Storyland: |
Roundtable
Discussions |
Visit
http://www.calstate.edu/CPDC/fpm_conference/index.shtml
for detailed conference information and to register.
Nancy
Freelander-Paice, Executive Program and Fiscal Manager
LAND
USE PLANNING & ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW (LUPER)
Faculty and Staff Housing Issues Gain Prominence in
CSU: The unit recently surveyed faculty and staff housing
projects across the system in response to increasing project
initiatives from campuses that have decided to explore this
concept. Many campuses have long recognized the declining affordability
of housing in their local and regional areas as recruitment
and retention of qualified faculty and staff becomes more difficult
due to the sky rocketing price of even modest housing. The intent
of the survey was to gain insight in to what makes a successful
project, and to identify the range of product types and pricing
for affordability that these varying projects provide.
As
expected, each campus brings a different set of objectives and
methods to the table, but all with the same ultimate goal of
providing a needed tool in the search for qualified faculty
and staff, particularly as retirements continue to increase
and create vacancies. The surprising results found that over
half of the CSU campuses are planning for faculty and staff
housing, and at least seven campuses have projects either completed
and occupied or currently under construction. Six campuses are
in various stages of planning or have recently acquired land
specifically for faculty and staff housing. In many scenarios,
the university foundation or a purpose-specific auxiliary housing
corporation is the vehicle for the actual funding and development,
including the purchase of land and ownership of the construction
project. The projects vary from strictly high-rise, urban-oriented
developments; to more traditional single-family homes; and a
mixed-range of product types, including rental apartments, attached
town homes, and condominium units all in one planned community.
The significant survey finding is that approximately 4,500 to
5,000 combined units of faculty and staff housing, in all product
and price ranges, are either existing, under construction, or
planned for development within the next 5-7 years within the
CSU system. This is a reflection of the housing market in California
and its direct impact on the mission of the CSU. Although this
finding is not substantial compared to the number of CSU employees
in all categories, it is a strong indicator that faculty and
staff housing is gaining priority in campuses’ plans to
meet the needs of the state for higher education.
David
Rosso, Chief of Land Use Planning & Environmental Review
FACILITIES
PLANNING
The
2006/07 State and Non-state Funded Capital Outlay Program and
the 2006/07 through 2010/11 Five-Year Capital Improvement Program
is proposed for approval by the trustees at the September 2005
board meeting. The 2006/07 program request over $427 million
for state funded projects, including $25 million for Minor Capital
Outlay and $50 million for Capital Renewal. The Governor’s
Higher Education Compact with the CSU supports future capital
outlay funding from general obligation or lease revenue bonds.
Funding for the 2006/07 program is proposed through a combination
of previously approved general obligation bond measures and
additional bond measures in 2006 in accordance with the Governor’s
compact.
The
2006/07 Capital Outlay Program budget reflects a significant
escalation in the cost of energy, construction labor, and building
materials that continues a nationwide trend recognized by the
Department of Finance (DOF). Under new DOF capital outlay program
guidelines, all CSU project budgets will be escalated to the
midpoint of construction. This measure acknowledges the inflationary
effect of prolonged building cost escalation. As a result, the
CSU construction cost guideline for the 2007/08 Capital Outlay
Program reflects an additional increase of 5% based on the latest
DOF budget memo.
Larry
Piper, Chief of Facilities Planning
ARCHITECTURE
& ENGINEERING
FEMA
Pre-mitigation Grant Funding Likely on Three CSU Projects:
As an extension to our successful Seismic Review program, CPDC
has been able to participate in a federal grant program that
may add funds to some of our current capital projects. Earlier
this year, CPDC submitted six capital projects with a seismic
retrofit component to a FEMA Pre-Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Grant
Program for supplemental funding. This federal program was designed
to help fund projects that could help reduce the severity of
loss in potential disaster scenarios such as flooding or seismic
events.
Three
projects, Cal Poly Pomona, Science Renovation; CSU San Bernardino,
Biological Sciences Renovation; and CSU San Bernardino, Physical
Science Renovation, have passed the initial FEMA appraisal and
are now in the final phase of environmental and historic preservation
review. It is expected that these projects will receive some
grant funding. Although not yet finalized, award amounts are
anticipated to range from $900 thousand to $2.4 million per
project. FEMA is obligated to commit to grant funding by the
end of the federal fiscal year (October 2005).
FEMA
recently announced that the PDM Grant Program would be renewed
for 2006. CPDC will coordinate and manage applications for 2006
capital projects.
Tom
Kennedy, Chief of Architecture & Engineering
PLANT,
ENERGY AND UTILITIES
Sustainability:
The Energy and Sustainability Report is complete and an overview
will be presented at the September Board of Trustees’
meeting. The report provides an in-depth look into the CSU’s
past accomplishments and its current performance against energy
reduction goals. It also identifies feasible renewable energy
alternatives for campuses to consider when planning for future
load growth and energy independence. As reported, although the
CSU did not achieve the 15% reduction goal, the 10% avoided
energy use is notable when considering the increased use and
installation of technology equipment that has changed many standard
classroom buildings into complex facilities that must accommodate
student and faculty demand. To illustrate the CSU’s accomplishment,
the equivalent avoided energy consumed calculates to 150,000
tons of CO2 emissions from 1999/00-2004/05. This is comparable
to planting 120,000 acres of trees or preserving 1,100 acres
of forest.
Electricity
Purchase: Energy prices continue their stratospheric
climb. Natural gas is hovering around $1.10 per Therm. The Energy
Contract Oversight Board (ECOB) has taken steps to create a
taskforce to study and recommend new strategies for electricity
purchases to address the unprecedented run up in energy prices.
Critical path items have been identified and several specific
options are being studied. Phase 1 of the Integrated Resource
Plan should be completed in October 2005 with specific recommendations
due in January 2006.
Energy
Efficiency Partnership Training & Education: The
Energy Efficiency (EE) Partnership provides training classes
for project managers, building operators, energy managers and
other campus staff. The classes are designed to support the
campuses in achieving the systemwide sustainability goals. Please
visit the partnership website at www.uccsuiouee.org
to review available classes and to register. The classes are
funded by the partnership and travel is reimbursed via a stipend.
Len
Pettis, Chief of Plant, Energy & Utilities
CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
Compliance
with Disabled Veteran Business Enterprise Bid Requirements:
Systemwide reporting of disabled veteran business enterprise
(DVBE) participation in capital project contracts remains low,
despite the commendable efforts by a few campuses to meet or
exceed the minimum three percent participation goals. The CSU
can do a better job.
The
Chancellor’s Office strongly urges campuses to include
DVBEs when beginning projects by providing notice to DVBEs for
feasibility studies, survey work, or constructability reviews,
and notifying them regarding design team selection and advertisement
for construction. Campuses should also provide the Notice to
Contractors to known DVBEs in the local area and invite them
to attend the pre bid job walks and introduce them to the contractors
in attendance.
The
Chancellor’s Office has formed a taskforce to address
improved utilization of DVBEs in its contracts. Campuses will
be informed as details regarding potential solutions emerge.
Jim
Corsar, Chief of Construction Management
|