|
CAPITAL
PLANNING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
J. Patrick Drohan, Assistant Vice
Chancellor
CONSTRUCTION
MANAGEMENT
SUAM, Section
XII-Construction Management for Public Works
Contracts
In April, CPDC updated the State University
Administrative Manual (SUAM), Section
XII-Construction Management for Public Works
Contracts, primarily in response to the 2001
construction audit recommendations. A listing of
the specific changes follows:
Section 9701, Categories of Public Works
Projects, has been modified to include language
regarding contractors and/or consultants who donate
construction work or consulting services. It
requires that donated work not diminish attention
required to be given to non-donated contract work
and that the contractor or consultant not monitor
or inspect the donated construction work or
service.
Section 9721.08, Allowances, has been
modified to include a definition of allowances and
a brief explanation of the process for using them.
Also samples of allowances are provided, along with
the requirement that all allowances be submitted to
the CPDC construction engineer for review and
approval prior to bid is included. The revision
further includes the requirement that allowances
shall not exceed ten percent of the project's
construction value.
Section 9721.07, Alternatives, has been
modified to clarify when Department of Finance does
not need to approve alternatives. Additionally,
language has been added identifying the methods for
adding alternative work back into the project after
the contract has been awarded. A caution is added
that if alternatives are added back into the
project after the time limit has expired for doing
so, the cost for this scope of work shall be priced
according to change order procedures.
Section 9722. Contract General
Conditions, has been modified to include the
suggestion that if there is any question on the
interpretation of the Contract General Conditions,
the construction administrator shall contact the
Chief of Construction Management in CPDC.
Section 9780.03, Contract Documents, has
language suggesting that the construction
administrator use the agreement form in Appendix D
for both major and minor capital outlay projects.
This section also has been divided into three
sections to better identify specific issues:
|
9780.03.01
|
Contract Documents-Official Set
|
|
9780.03.02
|
Review of Contract Documents
|
|
9780.03.03
|
Distribution of Contract Documents.
A sentence has been added clarifying
that CPDC does not sign contracts for
campus-delegated projects.
|
Section 9820.01, Subcontractor Mark-ups,
has been modified to clarify that when adding or
deducting scope that was identified as alternatives
in the bid, but not awarded within the time period
defined in the bid proposal, the contractor is not
bound to prices submitted with his/her bid, unless
he/she voluntarily agrees to extend the time
period. Costs for these added/deleted scopes will
be priced per the change order procedure.
9820.02, Scope Changes (New Project), has
been modified to caution campuses that adding in
scope that is outside the program is a violation of
the bidding process. It also addresses completion
of streamlined projects without any change to its
scope.
New forms: the Service Agreement
boilerplate was amended to include the requirement
for errors and omissions insurance for all services
related to the construction project. The
Pre-qualification forms have also been modified.
Both have been added to Appendix D as well as being
posted on the CPDC website.
Staff may download a copy of the newly updated
SUAM, Section XII, and the new forms in Appendix D,
from the CPDC website: www.calstate.edu/cpdc,
under "Executive."
Design/Build
Contract General Conditions and Model
The Design/Build Contract General Conditions
have recently been updated and are available on
CPDC's website. Staff is working on an update to
the Design/Build Model & Guidelines for
presentation in CPDC's training coming up in
October.
Construction
Manager at Risk with Guaranteed Maximum
Price
Staff is also working on a new model and
guidelines for Construction Manager at Risk with
Guaranteed Maximum Price (CM at Risk) for
presentation in CPDC's October training.
James R. Corsar, Chief of Construction
Management
CPDC
EXECUTIVE
CSU Capital
Training Program 2002
- The Law of Design and Construction - July
25
- Job Order Contracting - July 26
- Construction Claims Mitigation - October
24
- Design-Build Process - October 25
- Construction Management at Risk with
Guaranteed Maximum Price - October 25
Interested parties may register for the upcoming
capital training sessions on "The Law of Design and
Construction" and "Job Order Contracting" as well
as other 2002 programs by visiting the CPDC website
at http://www.calstate.edu/CPDC/Trg2002.shtml.
Participant feedback from training sessions that
have already been held in 2002 has been very
positive.
CPDC Due
Dates for CPB&G Agenda Items
Listed below are the dates that CPB&G
agenda items are due to CPDC. These dates are
provided to assist campuses in planning
projects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 16-17, 2002
September 17-18, 2002
October 31, 2002
November 12-13, 2002
|
May 14, 2002
July 16, 2002
N/A
September 10, 2002
|
May 28, 2002
July 30. 2002
N/A
September 24, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 28-29, 2003
March 11-12, 2003
May 13-14, 2003
July 15-16, 2003
September 16-17, 2003
October 31, 2003
November 18-19, 2003
|
November 26, 2002
January 14, 2003
March 11, 2003
May 13, 2003
July 15, 2003
N/A
September 16, 2003
|
December 10, 2002
January 28, 2003
March 25, 2003
May 27, 2003
July 29, 2003
N/A
September 30, 2003
|
State University Administrative Manual (SUAM)
Please visit the CPDC website at http://www.calstate.edu/CPDC/SUAM.shtml
for recent updates to the State University
Administrative Manual related to capital planning,
design and construction. The revisions address
changes in trustee policy and state agency
requirements, audit recommendations, plus
organizational, administrative and general updates
to sections last revised in 1998.
Linda Burke, Director of
Trustees/Legislative/Capital Training
Programs
FACILITIES
PLANNING
The
Capital Outlay Program
The November 6, 2002 ballot will include the
School Facilities: Kindergarten-University Public
Facilities Education Bond Act of 2002 and 2004.
CSU projects that are funded in this initiative
will include the projects approved by the
legislature for inclusion in the Governor's Budget
for 2002/03, the Economic Stimulus Package, as well
as the 2003/04 Capital Outlay Program.
The final CSU 2003/04 Capital Outlay Program
will be presented to the Trustees for approval in
September 2002. The program will contain the
campuses' maps, histories, and the five-year
capital improvement program, as well as the
Presidents' statements regarding what the projects
will accomplish and their importance to the
campuses.
A change to the 2004/05 Categories and Criteria
was proposed to the Executive Deans in March. CPDC
has suggested returning to the
one-project-per-campus limitation in the action
year (exceptions will be retained).
Schedule
of Submissions and Calendar of Capital Outlay
Process
|
May 20, 2002
|
Campuses submit updated maps and
histories for the 2003/04 Capital
Program.
|
|
June 7, 2002
|
Campuses submit 2003/04 Minor Capital
Outlay Program.
|
|
July 5, 2002
|
Campuses submit Draft Capital
Improvement Program for 2004/05 (CPDC
1-1).
|
|
July 5, 2002
|
Campuses submit Annual Custodial Space
Changes for the 2003/04 Support
Budget.
|
|
July 16-17, 2002
|
Board of Trustees approves the 2004/05
Categories and Criteria.
|
|
August 2002
|
Campuses submit Annual Updates to the
Space and Facilities Data Base.
|
Executive Deans
and Plant Directors Subcommittee Meeting, May 30,
2002
The first subcommittee meeting of the CSU
Executive Deans and Plant Directors is scheduled
for Thursday, May 30, 2002, at the Chancellor's
Office. The committee is comprised of Executive
Deans-Jay Bond (Fullerton), Scott Charmack (Long
Beach), Carl Coffey (Stanislaus), Robert Kitamura
(San Luis Obispo), William Shum (San Bernardino),
Beverly Wood (Monterey Bay); Physical Plant
Directors-Bob Brown (Bakersfield), Scott Burns (San
Diego), Robert Hutson (San Francisco), Ed Naretto
(San Luis Obispo), Robert Quirk (Long Beach); CABO
Liaison Dan Johnson (Monterey Bay); Patrick Drohan
and CPDC Senior Managers. These joint meetings
will minimize the number of trips for systemwide
meetings and promote discussion of issues impacting
facilities management, planning, design and
construction. One identified agenda item will be a
review of the proposed changes to Executive Order
757: Planned Maintenance and Capital Renewal
Program.
Elvyra San Juan, Chief of Facilities
Planning
PLANT,
ENERGY AND UTILITIES
On April 1, 2002, the CSU and its energy
partner, the University of California, entered into
a new Direct Access (DA) Service Agreement with
Arizona Public Service Energy Services (APSES) to
supply power for 19 CSU and 9 UC campuses (and the
segments' headquarters offices). The agreement
replaces the 4-year DA arrangement the CSU/UC had
with Enron Energy Services. While the initial
strategy was to extend the existing contract with
Enron, the California Public Utility Commission
made the decision to allow existing DA customers to
enter into new agreements with new DA providers.
Considering the Enron debacle and the rapidly
changing energy regulatory and political
environment, the move to APSES came at a very good
time for the CSU. It will allow the campuses to
enjoy savings compared to what they would have paid
for comparable service from their local utility
(PG&E, SCE, or SDG&E) and receive a variety
of services to enable enhanced management of campus
electrical loads.
As a part of the final closeout of the Enron
contract, a third party auditing firm secured by
the CSU, will be visiting each campus to reconcile
Enron and utility billing records for the past 14
months. This process will assure accurate final
payments/credits to Enron for any outstanding
billings and/or services. The process is expected
to take 4-6 months.
Natural gas unit prices are presently at very
low levels. In an effort to take advantage of this
window of opportunity, CPDC is working with the
Department of General Services to structure
agreements for securing long-term fixed price gas
with contract periods of up to 5 years. This
approach to natural gas purchasing offers stability
and cost savings for the campuses over time, and
provides protection from price spikes such as those
experienced in 2001. Campuses will have the
opportunity to elect varying percentages of fixed
price gas to match their anticipated usage over the
contract period.
Mark Gutheinz - Chief of Plant, Energy and
Utilities
|